Florissant City Council Denies Park Side Estates Request to Reduce

The council voted 6-2 to not allow the subdivision to decrease the size of homes from 1,600 square feet to 1,200 square feet.

Park Side Estates got its answer to whether it could begin building smaller homes in Florissant Monday night, but it wasn’t without a great deal of discussion and a bit of fireworks during the City Council meeting.

The council failed the bill, which would have allowed the minimum square footage of homes in the subdivision to begin at 1,200 square feet.

Initially, councilors had motioned to postpone Bill 8863, but the council split the vote, 4-4, which resulted in the postponement move failing. But Mayor Tom Schneider didn’t appreciate the split vote.

He said he was alarmed that the council wouldn’t pass a postponement and strongly asked that they reconsider the vote so the entire council could vote on the matter. Ward 7 Councilwoman Jackie Pagano was absent due to a family emergency.

Florissant residents voiced split sentiments about the development with one in support of the reduction in size and others wanting the developer to stick to their original plan.

In a previous meeting, Ward 2 Councilman John Grib, who represents the ward where the subdivision is located, explained the history of the project and his objections to the amendment.

He compared the reduction to a class where 1,600 equals an A and 1,200 equals a C and said that Paul wants to provide a C project.

“Residents deserve A quality, not C quality,” Grib said. “What you’re looking to do is reduce the costs of houses, and I don’t know we’re here to do that … I urge everyone on this council to think about this.”

Councilman Grib said following the meeting that he had spoken to a number of residents in his ward about the matter and all had supported him in his decision. He said he was happy that six of eight councilors voted with him.

In a memo to city councilors Mayor Tom Schneider indicated that a housing development at 1,200 square feet would provide quality and exciting floor plans and amenities as well as be a bit larger than most existing homes in the city. Furthermore, he said that the administration was in favor of amending the residential designed development.

In another memo from Economic Development Director Bob Russell, he made note that other developers would be watching the council and this bill and noted that the “inflexibility” of the council could make developers want to look at other locations for building. The council failed the bill 6-2.

Elizabeth O'Fallon October 09, 2012 at 05:51 PM
The Mayor was furious that the bill was not postponed until the next meeting because one Council Member was absent. They had a quorum so the voting was completely valid. How many bills passed during the Ward #3 and Ward #6 vacancies? The Mayor is not a voting member of the Council and doesn't have the right to pick and choose what bills should or should not pass. I found his behavior last night disturbing as it was not very fitting of a public representative of our city.
concerned citizen October 11, 2012 at 07:48 PM
I watched the meeting and saw Mr Schneider make a fool of himself, throwing a tantrum and slamming his hands on the desk like a child. Not the kind of actions you would expect from someone in his position. I think he owes the city council and the residents an apology. And the final vote was 6 against, so what is he upset about?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »