This Senate race is about Convictions not Connections
Endorsements: Ecumenical Leadership Council, Planned Parenthood, Coalition of Black Trade Unions (CBTU), Fire Fighters Institute for Racial Equality (FIRE), members of Missouri Progressive Action Group, Spanish Lake Democratic Committee, Ferguson/Florissant School Board and Jennings School Board. Currently, serves on the ACLU-EM’s Muslim Rights Task Force.
Graduate of St Louis University and University City High School – Currently, serves on the ACLU-EM’s Muslim Rights Task Force and is a member of Omega Psi Phi Fraternity.
Education – In 2000, Redditt Hudson founded Project Peace, an organization which addresses issues of accountability and responsibility for students in high schools and in communities. Early childhood education must be properly funded, says Redditt. The best crime-fighting tool is early childhood education. Every child must have access to education early. You must create stable neighborhoods throughout the region and you will improve public schools. We have to create quality schools right here where they live. Children shouldn’t have to be transferred or bused somewhere else to learn. Charter schools aren’t better than our public schools. Legislators who find a way to take more resources away from public education every year will be challenged by Redditt Hudson.
Family Values – a dedicated husband and father. 2 times Father of the Year Award winner from Ferguson Florissant School District
Home Foreclosures – North county neighborhoods are among those hardest hit. Redditt’s opponent discovered this problem as she was leaving office in 2010. Of course by then the problem was 3 years old. Not to mention it was occurring in the district she represented.
Leadership – A trained leader – 2010 graduate of the prestigious LEADERSHIP ST. LOUIS® (LSL) program - one of the most highly-respected leadership development programs in the nation. Redditt Hudson has empowered targeted communities to protect their residents by teaching them about their civil rights and training them to interact safely and effectively with police officers. Redditt Hudson knows how to do the right thing without being told. After all, he spearheaded the initiative and successfully achieved the naming of University High School Gym after former coach, Edward Crenshaw.
Legislative Experience – Redditt Hudson’s position at ACLU calls on him to challenge many regulations that disenfranchise people. He is a regular media commentator on criminal justice and racial justice issues. He has traveled the country speaking at statewide events, at national conferences for the ACLU, NAACP, offering legislative testimony, and keynoting other events focused on criminal justice and racial justice issues. Redditt’s debate experience will be an asset when elected State Senate for 13th District.
Safety – Redditt Hudson, a former St Louis City police officer, left the force in 1999 and devoted himself to addressing issues of police misconduct and to searching for ways to improve police-community relations. The Missouri House owes all of us an apology. The nonsense they have been wasting time and our tax dollars on this year is beyond comprehension. Most of what they want to pass is unconstitutional, violates federal law or worse. And they know that.
Senior Citizens - Challenging a health care law that has already afforded coverage to millions of previously uninsured Americans is absurd. Redditt Hudson supports the Affordable Health Care Act and will help President Obama’s agenda.
Voter Suppression – The GOP is working to disenfranchise voters while costing MO tax-payers millions. Redditt’s opponent supports this idea.
Women Rights – Missouri’s top legislators really do dwell, figuratively, under a rock. Do they really think the topic of sexual orientation can be expunged from classrooms and hallways and consigned to the family dinner table? Couple that with the notion that blind people no longer deserve state-provided health care. Redditt Hudson supports access to birth control without discrimination or additional co-pays; access to medically accurate, comprehensive sex education for our youth; and keeping decisions about pregnancy personal, because these decisions are just not that simple. Redditt says, “I am for women being treated equally in all our processes and having equal access to opportunities. I’ve learned by standing up for the rights of people in our community that the fight for justice, equality, and inclusion is never easy, but it’s worth the fight.”
Melissa Campbell
7:49 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012
Listening to some of Planned Parenthoods commercials about kids and the day after pill, I lost all respect for them..........nor should tax dollars pay for abortions.
After reading this article, in my opinion, this guy is NOT who we need for our district.
Jo Ann Brown
9:30 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012
Redditt Hudson and President Obama agrees with you "tax dollars should not be used to pay for abortions." That's why tax dollars don't pay for abortions. Commercials sell lies and distortions. No one should rely solely on a commercial to form their opinions about important issues that affect Women.
Debbie
10:37 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012
I agree Melissa . I will be voting for Gina Walsh!!! Go Gina!!
Elizabeth O'Fallon
9:11 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012
How can you say that tax dollars are not used to pay for abortions when the Affordable Care Act clearly covers them? A politician can say "tax dollars should not be used to pay for abortions" but that doesn't mean he can make that happen. Does Mr. Hudson and Mrs. Walsh support repealing the Affordable Care Act?
Elizabeth O'Fallon
9:26 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012
I've read 200 pages of the Affordable Care Act on my own as well as read dozens (possibly hundreds) of articles on the subject of health care in the past 3 years. In the bill itself from what I've read there is way too much administrative oversight granted to Health and Human Services Secretary, Katherine Sebelius. Ms. Sebelius is a firm advocate of choice and Planned Parenthood--an organization that is propped up by government grants. From my personal reading on the subject, as much as 1/3 of their total revenue comes from these grants. By supporting organizations like Planned Parenthood you are supporting abortion. Yes, Planned Parenthood gives out a lot of contraceptives but there is no debate that they are #1 in the abortion business.
For a list of ways the ACA supports taxpayer funding of abortion, read the article here: http://www.lifenews.com/2012/03/29/affordable-care-act-the-greatest-expansion-of-aborton-since-roe/
Jo Ann Brown
9:58 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Federal funds cannot be used for abortion coverage or care http://dpc.senate.gov/healthreformbill/healthbill18.pdf .
Many readers have asked us to review a recent claim reverberating around the Internet that stems from an article posted on an anti-abortion website, lifenews.com. The March 12, 2012, article is titled, "Obama Admin Finalizes Rules: $1 Abortions in ObamaCare." We rate this claim False. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/21/blog-posting/does-barack-obamas-health-care-bill-include-1-abor/
.
Elizabeth O'Fallon
9:17 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012
I beg to differ with you Joy and here is why...If you want to get technical the bill does not mention the word "abortion." It also does not state whether or not abortions will be covered. It also doesn't specifically prohibit abortions from being paid for with taxpayer funds. I've read a lot of legislation and I've read enough to know that if something is not specifically prohibited in the bill, it's covered.
Another problem with this bill is that the power rests with the Health and Human Services Secretary to determine what will be covered. Ms. Sebelius is the one currently responsible for writing the "policy" or "coverage" of ACA. Her record speaks for itself on the issue of abortion. You can google her public record during her time as Governor of Kansas for more information.
On the campaign trail, President Obama promised Planned Parenthood that the "first thing he would do as President" is pass FOCA, the Freedom of Choice Act (a piece of legislation that lifts many of the current restrictions on abortion). I would argue that passing FOCA was no longer necessary after passing the Affordable Care Act because of the powers now granted to HHS. As more and more of the bill goes into effect, time will soon tell which one of us is correct on this issue.
Jo Ann Brown
11:02 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012
Let the facts speak for themselves. The Supreme Court has spoken. The Law stands. Enough said,
Elizabeth O'Fallon
1:14 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012
What about slavery? The Supreme Court was certainly wrong with their decision on the Dred Scott case, http://florissant.patch.com/blog_posts/dred-scotts-legacy
The Supreme Court decision upheld the mandate of Obamacare but but stated that it is in fact a tax. We were told by the President that no matter what "it wasn't a tax increase." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvE6zp6HMMg I'm wondering if the Affordable Care Act had been presented as a tax originally if it still would have passed through Congress.
There are always two sides to every issue, and it is my firm belief that debate is good. I don't believe in trying to squelch it by saying that all can be said on this issue has already been said.
Israel Shaw
2:25 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012
Joy, I don't think you have actually addressed any of Elizabeth's points other than offering a soundbite and offering a link. Your "they said it, that settles it" is disturbing and naive. I doubt that is how you actually think.