patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

What You Need to Know About Community Improvement Districts

In light of a recent CID filing, "Patch" rounds up the facts on community improvement districts.

 

The City of Florissant recently received its first community improvement district (CID) filing, thanks to THF Florissant, the firm working to bring a Walmart to the city.

The CID concept was first introduced to St. Louis County in the St. Louis County Strategic Plan 2000-2004. The plan focused on the need to reinvest in older communities. It explained that as the county aged, it was vitally important to preserve and stabilize its older neighborhoods.   

Other key concerns outlined in the plan were maintenance of aging housing and commercial structures to prevent deterioration, revitalizing commercial and industrial areas which no longer met contemporary standards, producing redevelopment plans for declining or blighted areas and maintaining streets, sidewalks and waterlines.

The plan notes that, in the late ‘50s and early '60s, many Americans, including St. Louisans, moved from the city to what are now considered “inner-ring” suburbs, including cities such as Florissant.

“This exodus was followed by additional migration as the population gained affluence and newer housing met modern consumer preferences,” stated the plan. “But inner-ring suburbs that flourished in the late 1960s and 1970s now are experiencing their urban neighbors’ population losses and economic decline as migrations continue and new housing products continue to improve.”

This so-called “second urban crisis” was affecting St. Louis County as it faced similar “urban aging pressures” such as older populations, harder to maintain homes and business structures, obsolete commercial centers and other issues, the plan stated.

“Community disinvestment and neighborhood decline are now not only problems associated with a big city,” the plan read. “In fact, community deterioration, especially in suburbs that were once blue-collar and middle-class, has the ability to accelerate and intensify.”

The CID legislation was approved by the Missouri Legislature in 1998. A CID was defined as a special benefit that allows groups of property owners to assess and tax themselves for community improvement and services within their district.

How CIDs are created

A district board manages a CID. Depending on the petition, the board may be appointed by the St. Louis County Executive with consent of the County Council, or it may be elected by voters in the district. Community improvement districts become independent political subdivisions.

To establish a CID, a valid petition must be submitted to the appropriate governing body. A valid petition must specify the size, area and duration of the district, as well as the maximum rate of taxes which can be imposed and the method and maximum rate of assessment.

The petition must also be signed by more than 50 percent of property owners (by assessed value) within the boundaries of the proposed district. A public hearing is held to approve or deny the CID.

The petition must also outline several other factors, such as maximum rates for real property taxes that can be submitted to voters for approval. Before taxes can be levied, an election must be held through a mail-in ballot, and a majority vote is required.

The tax levy can’t exceed the rate stated on the petition without a vote from property owners, and taxes are collected and redistributed in the same way as real property taxes.

CID quick facts

  • A CID is a geographically defined district in which commercial property owners choose (by a vote) to impose a self-tax.
  • CIDs are considered a powerful public-private partnership. They have been used successfully throughout the country to revitalize cities.
  • CIDs can directly enhance property values by allowing property owners to decide how funds are spent in their area.
  • CID funds can add to existing services, such as public safety, and they can be used to leverage additional public and private funds.
  • CIDs can make improvements to a variety of areas in a community, including water, public transportation, street and road construction and maintenance, parks and recreational areas and facilities, storm water and sewage, parking areas and more.
  • Would you support a CID for Wlamart?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        13 (20%)
    • No
        30 (48%)
    • I want more information
        19 (30%)
    Total votes: 62
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Community Improvement District, Florissant Walmart, St. Louis County CID, St. Louis County Planning Commission, Walmart, and Walmart CID
What do you think about the CID proposal? Tell us in the comments.

Susan Geerling

8:49 am on Monday, November 21, 2011

I am not in favor of allowing THF to have their proposed development designated a Community Improvement District. In order to keep the "playing field" equal between Wal Mart and the stores they will be competing with for business, it would be unfair to allow them special tax incentives that existing stores did not have. When K-Mart, Target, Shop 'n Save were built (the nearest competitors), they were not given tax incentives. They were built "on their own dime." The Schnucks store at The Shoppes at Cross Keys is there under a TIF, but existed at the same location without a TIF, and in order to remain where they are they had to go along with the Sansone Development's TIF guidelines.

Wal Mart has plenty of money to build this store with their own funds. A CID would require shoppers of that development to pay an additional amount in taxes for shopping at that store. The monies collect would benefit THF/Wal Mart's development in a way that is unfair to their existing competitors.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elizabeth O'Fallon

8:35 am on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Totally agree Susan. Thank you for your informative response.

Patch_comments_icon

Maggie Rotermund

1:59 pm on Monday, November 21, 2011

Great information on CIDs. Very informative.

Reply

Joe McClurg

3:55 pm on Monday, November 21, 2011

If this is such a wonderful move by Walmart, let them foot the bill. I see no benefit to even having them in Florissant. Has any study been done on the impact to existing businesses, including locally owned ones? Oh, yeah, a study not done by Walmart or THF. And, has any thought been given to the way in which Walmart maintains its properties? One only has to look at the absolute dump on W. Florissant to get an idea of the quality of upkeep.

Reply

Matt Sanders

8:47 am on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

I have mixed feelings about this. even if the council says no, I have a bad feeling that they will still go in with or without the CID regardless of what the city says, because planning and zoning will still let them build regardless. I have nothing against Walmart, I agree with everyone they should pay for it themselves. I have bad feeling that they are going to find away to get A CID regardless

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elizabeth O'Fallon

9:25 am on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

I think if we made a good enough showing when the public hearing for the CID comes up that they will build without it. Come to the meeting, speak out, and let your voice be heard.

Maria Jansen

1:27 pm on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

I agree that if Walmart wants to build, they are totally capable of doing so without a CID. I don't blame them for exploring it, everyone wants to get the most for their money, right? But I do hope it doesn't happen that way.

Reply

Chris Martinez

9:05 am on Thursday, November 24, 2011

Walmart can do more by its host cities. They gave the benefits below to a DC neighborhood. Don't get shortchanged Florissant. Http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/wal-mart-makes-a-good-deal-for-dc-stores-even-better/2011/11/22/gIQAHvWDqN_story.html? tid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost

Reply

Leave a comment